Search results

Yea, but its becoming ever so apparent that Intel is actually getting back into the clock speed + IPC game, along with some high fsbs to boot, the PIV is lookin better than it ever did.

I've tried to contact him, but his email that i have be gonez.

Is Blair has his way we're to be the 51st state :rolleyes:

atm Ati rule, but i know Nvidia something awfully powerful is afoot. I'd more compare a GF4MX to a FIRST generation radeon 7200 :lol:

Most of the actual contributing is done from OTC members.

And don't feel bad if you join, same owners, we're a family. ;)

From what little about linux i know i agree.

Athlon64@ xbit

:lol:

:hbd: though i've never ever seen you.

Lets see that two yr anni, you get a gold icon for that :laugh:

ouch mate..

http://www.wallabie.com/main/hardware_parts.asp?categoryId=7

Has to be the cd-r, any 700-750mb cd won't be capable of more than say 10-20mb more, the software can't go above the cd-r capability, overburning just uses that 'extra space' if available. Theres 800 and 900MB cds, but your burner has to be capable of reading the added sectors and overburning...

Btw, i don't know how it'll be much faster on a daily basis, as the big increases is when editing or using large files.

less seek time = faster performance as the data is stored in segments between the 2 drives, hence the head dosen't move as much, the data is spread out over two drives and can therefore be accessed much faster than a single drive is able to. Drawback is when one goes it all goes.

Trying hard! :beerbang:

i burn 800 and 900Mb cds too, but i do mostly dvds now, agreed.

My TDK D-view 48x media does 52x without breakin a sweat.

Yea had that message once, next time i went back all was fine.