The Good Neighbor, Canadian news article

Neo

Administrator
Staff member
America: The Good Neighbor.

Widespread but only partial news coverage was given recently to a
remarkable editorial broadcast from Toronto by Gordon Sinclair, a
Canadian television commentator. What follows is the full text of his
trenchant remarks as printed in the Congressional Record:

"This Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the Americans as the
most generous and possibly the least appreciated people on all the
earth.

Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy were lifted
out of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in billions of
dollars and forgave other billions in debts. None of these countries is
today paying even the interest on its remaining debts to the United
States.

When France was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the Americans
who propped it up, and their reward was to be insulted and swindled on
the streets of Paris. I was there. I saw it.

When earthquakes hit distant cities, it is the United States that
hurries in to help. This spring, 59 American communities were flattened
by tornadoes. Nobody helped.

The Marshall Plan and the Truman Policy pumped billions of dollars into
discouraged countries. Now newspapers in those countries are writing
about the decadent, warmongering Americans.

I'd like to see just one of those countries that is gloating over the
erosion of the United States dollar build its own airplane. Does any
other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo Jet,
the Lockheed Tri-Star, or the Douglas DC10? If so, why don't they fly
them?

Why do all the International lines except Russia fly American planes?
Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or woman on
the moon? You talk about Japanese technocracy, and you get radios. You
talk about German technocracy, and you get automobiles. You talk about
American technocracy, and you find men on the moon - not once, but
several times - and safely home again. You talk about scandals, and the
Americans put theirs right in the store window for everybody to look at.
Even their draft-dodgers are not pursued and hounded. They are here on
our streets, and most of them, unless they are breaking Canadian laws,
are getting American dollars from ma and pa at home to spend here.

When the railways of France, Germany and India were breaking down
through age, it was the Americans who rebuilt them. When the
Pennsylvania Railroad and the New York Central went broke, nobody loaned
them an old caboose. Both are still broke.

I can name you 5000 times when the Americans raced to the help of other
people in trouble. Can you name me even one time when someone else
raced to the Americans in trouble? I don't think there was outside help
even during the San Francisco earthquake. Our neighbors have faced it
alone, and I'm one Canadian who is damned tired of hearing them get
kicked around. They will come out of this thing with their flag high.
And when they do, they are entitled to thumb their nose at the lands
that are gloating over their present troubles. I hope Canada is not one
of those."

Stand proud, America!
 

Fuser Man

blah, blah, blah
We love you guys(even though Bush said Mexico is your #1 friend). If you ever need a hand, you know where we are.
 

fury

Administrator
Staff member
Frankly, I'm sick of America being the good neighbor when we're getting jack/insulted/attacked in return.

Sorry if I offend you/sound arrogant, but I'm glad some people have realized that even though our president may stumble on words sometimes, America runs in to help when another country is in need, even when America needs to help itself.
 

Professur

Mushroom at large
Once again, I correct: that statement was mistakenly attributed to Gord Sinclair. but it was actually said by his father.
 

Gonzo

Infinitesimally Outrageous
Staff member
Originally posted by Professur
Once again, I correct: that statement was mistakenly attributed to Gord Sinclair. but it was actually said by his father.

As long as SOMEBODY said it.
 

flavio

superfly
Staff member
This is what my boss wrote in an email about this

be skeptical of this article. it was written in 1973 (gordon sinclair died
in 1984) and wasn't written in response to the tragedies of this week. the
chauvinism in this article is unnerving, unproductive, and is really (IMHO)
not the attitude to adopt w/r/t to what happened this week.

also, the article is factually inaccurate and ignores a lot. world support
after the San Francisco 1906 earthquake was huge, and the support offered by
NATO in response to this week's attacks have been considerable (and NATO is
comprised of mostly non-US and non-Canadian states). and pumping billions of
dollars into other countries, while noble, doesn't erase years of misguided
and harmful foreign policy (you can argue about what's misguided and
harmful, but it's more difficult to argue about much of the world's
perception of our foreign policy...dictators we've supported, atrocities
we've ignored in states from which the U.S. does not benefit politically or
economically, and etcetera).

nationalist chest-thumping doesn't help and can only serve to divide (and
without getting into the difficulties surrounding americans' definitions of
'what is an american'...many muslim and non-muslim middle-easterners are
afraid to leave their homes for (justified) fear of violence against
them)...something we really don't need right now, and it's a shame that mr.
sinclair's article has resurfaced in response to the tragedies of this week.

my $0.02.

tyler
 
Top