Goodbye Hussein, 2003

Gonzo

Infinitesimally Outrageous
Staff member
More misinformation from the government & the NY Times. The last paragraph, they forgot to add after the elections.

NY Times said:
U.S. Blueprint to Topple Hussein Envisions Big Invasion Next Year

By THOM SHANKER and DAVID E. SANGER

WASHINGTON, April 27 — The Bush administration, in developing a potential approach for toppling President Saddam Hussein of Iraq, is concentrating its attention on a major air campaign and ground invasion, with initial estimates contemplating the use of 70,000 to 250,000 troops.

The administration is turning to that approach after concluding that a coup in Iraq would be unlikely to succeed and that a proxy battle using local forces there would be insufficient to bring a change in power.

But senior officials now acknowledge that any offensive would probably be delayed until early next year, allowing time to create the right military, economic and diplomatic conditions. These include avoiding summer combat in bulky chemical suits, preparing for a global oil price shock, and waiting until there is progress toward ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
 

Q

stepmosnter
Staff member
How do you prepare for a global oil price shock? I just don't have anywhere to stockpile gasoline.
 

Gonzo

Infinitesimally Outrageous
Staff member
and then pay 28% tax on the proceeds to buy your overtaxed gasoline...lose/lose proposition...better than no proposal though
 
Maybe I'm wrong: but did Iraq not only exports a relatively small amount of oil to foreign countries?
Would to impact on the oil price be that high then?
 

Noite Escura

The unpredictable
Yes they produce a relatively small percentage of the world's oil. Though there are always some smartass hoping to use that kind of situation to take advantage and raise prices to get more $$$ from us fools.
 

Gato_Solo

Member
Invest in alternative energy sources, and petroleum becomes worthless. Hydrogen, Solar, hydroelectric, and, yes, even nuclear...
 
Top